6 results for 'cat:"Property" AND cat:"Damages" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Griggsby grants summary judgment in favor of the lessor in this lease contract dispute of three modular classroom units. The school failed to pay the rent due on the three leases. The school shall pay the lessor for a total of $387,828 for the breach of building payment, $80,142 for damages to the principal amount and $39,878 for prejudgment interest for the breach of classroom lease.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Griggsby, Filed On: December 18, 2023, Case #: 1:20cv887, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: property, damages, contract
J. Lazarus finds that the lower court properly dismissed a homeowner’s claims against a home inspection company she says failed to discover issues with her home’s foundation at the time of inspection. The homeowner’s claims against the company under the Home Inspection Law are time-barred. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Lazarus, Filed On: October 30, 2023, Case #: J-A18026-23, Categories: property, damages, contract
J. Byrne finds that the trial court improperly ruled against a construction firm in a breach of contract case brought by a homeowner alleging that it improperly built a retaining wall on the property. The construction firm was not a party named in the contract signed by the homeowner; therefore, it cannot be held liable for the breach of contract claims. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: August 9, 2023, Case #: 03-22-00457-CV, Categories: property, damages, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Gladwin finds the circuit court properly granted the counterclaim of the wife of the deceased land purchaser, quieting title to the property, giving her the warranty deed and title insurance, and granting $30,000 in compensatory damages. Payment on the land had allegedly become delinquent after her husband died, though she had no access to purged payment records. She was without her husband’s testimony as to payments he had made or agreements he may or may not have had with the seller’s predecessor in title. The seller also failed to provide sufficient records as proof of nonpayment. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gladwin, Filed On: May 10, 2023, Case #: CV-22-218, Categories: property, damages, contract